• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Lifestyle
Do We Need a Theory of Everything? thumbnail

Do We Need a Theory of Everything?

July 20, 2020
Jake Paul among 8 celebrities charged by SEC for ‘illegally touting’ crypto scheme thumbnail

Jake Paul among 8 celebrities charged by SEC for ‘illegally touting’ crypto scheme

March 23, 2023
Boston's new star puts on a Classic show thumbnail

Boston’s new star puts on a Classic show

March 23, 2023
Experts: Republicans’ “punitive” attacks on SNAP could strip food aid from over 10 million people thumbnail

Experts: Republicans’ “punitive” attacks on SNAP could strip food aid from over 10 million people

March 23, 2023
Hospitals re-evaluate masking, PPE as state mandates end thumbnail

Hospitals re-evaluate masking, PPE as state mandates end

March 23, 2023
With possible indictment looming, Trump dominates House Republican retreat thumbnail

With possible indictment looming, Trump dominates House Republican retreat

March 22, 2023
Astronomers sound alarm about light pollution from satellites thumbnail

Astronomers sound alarm about light pollution from satellites

March 22, 2023
Balanced budget takes back seat to paring spending to ‘22 levels at GOP retreat thumbnail

Balanced budget takes back seat to paring spending to ‘22 levels at GOP retreat

March 21, 2023
A potential Trump indictment is a sideshow gift to the Biden family thumbnail

A potential Trump indictment is a sideshow gift to the Biden family

March 21, 2023
Alaska oil drilling protesters disrupt White House climate adviser appearance thumbnail

Alaska oil drilling protesters disrupt White House climate adviser appearance

March 21, 2023
Biden vetoes Republican effort to overturn socially conscious retirement rule thumbnail

Biden vetoes Republican effort to overturn socially conscious retirement rule

March 21, 2023
Here’s How Gasoline Prices Fared Under The Last Four Presidents thumbnail

Here’s How Gasoline Prices Fared Under The Last Four Presidents

March 20, 2023
America used to have its own lion. Where did they go? thumbnail

America used to have its own lion. Where did they go?

March 20, 2023
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
  • Donate
Thursday, March 23, 2023
66 °f
Wellfleet
58 ° Tue
63 ° Wed
68 ° Thu
61 ° Fri
  • Login
  • Register
FREE Cape Cod News
DONATE
  • FREE Cape Cod News
  • News
    • News
    • Cape Cod News
    • Massachusetts
    • Breaking News
    • Cape Cod Weather
    • Storm Watch
    • Environment
  • Politics
    • democrats
    • republicans
  • Business
    • business
    • cryptocurrency
    • economy
    • money
    • Real Estate
    • Tech
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Photos
    • Orleans
    • Eastham
    • Wellfleet
    • Truro
    • Provincetown
    • Brewster
    • Chatham
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
Free Cape Cod News
No Result
View All Result
  • FREE Cape Cod News
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Photos
  • Videos
Home Lifestyle Nature

Do We Need a Theory of Everything?

FREE Cape Cod News by FREE Cape Cod News
July 20, 2020
in Nature
Reading Time: 7 mins read
Donate
0
Do We Need a Theory of Everything? thumbnail
634
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

I get constantly asked if I could please comment on other people’s theories of everything. That could be Garrett Lisi’s E8 theory or Eric Weinstein’s geometric unity or Stephen Wolfram’s idea that the universe is but a big graph, and so on. Good, then. Let me tell you what I think about this. But I’m afraid it may not be what you wanted to hear.



Before we start, let me remind you what physicists mean by a “Theory of Everything.” For all we currently know, the universe and everything in it is held together by four fundamental interactions. That’s the electromagnetic force, the strong and the weak nuclear force, and gravity. All other forces that you are familiar with, say, the van der Waals force, or muscle force, or the force that’s pulling you down an infinite sequence of links on Wikipedia, these are all non-fundamental forces that derive from the four fundamental interactions. At least in principle.

This whole idea of a theory of everything is based on an unscientific premise.

Now, three of the fundamental interactions, the electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear force, are of the same type. They are collected in what is known as the standard model of particle physics. The three forces in the standard model are described by quantum field theories which means, in a nutshell, that all particles obey the principles of quantum mechanics, like the uncertainty principle, and they can be entangled and so on. Gravity, however, is described by Einstein’s theory of General Relativity and does not know anything about quantum mechanics, so it stands apart from the other three forces. That’s a problem because we know that all the quantum particles in the standard model have a gravitational pull. But we do not know how this works. We just do not have a theory to describe how elementary particles gravitate. For this, we would need a theory for the quantum behavior of gravity, a theory of “quantum gravity,” as it’s called.

We need a theory of quantum gravity because general relativity and the standard model are mathematically incompatible. So far, this is a purely theoretical problem because with the experiments that we can currently do, we do not need to use quantum gravity. In all presently possible experiments, we either measure quantum effects, but then the particle masses are so small that we cannot measure their gravitational pull. Or we can observe the gravitational pull of some objects, but then they do not have quantum behavior. So, at the moment we do not need quantum gravity to actually describe any observation. However, this will hopefully change in the coming decades. I talked about this in an earlier video. 

Besides the missing theory of quantum gravity, there are various other issues that physicists have with the standard model. Most notably it’s that, while the three forces in the standard model are all of the same type, they are also all different in that each of them belongs to a different type of symmetry. Physicists would much rather have all these forces unified to one, which means that they would all come from the same mathematical structure. 

In many cases that structure is one big symmetry group. Since we do not observe this, the idea is that the big symmetry would manifest itself only at energies so high that we have not yet been able to test them. At the energies that we have tested it so far, the symmetry would have to be broken, which gives rise to the standard model. This unification of the forces of the standard model is called a “grand unification” or a “grand unified theory,” GUT for short. 

What physicists mean by a theory of everything is then a theory from which all the four fundamental interactions derive. This means it is both a grand unified theory and a theory of quantum gravity. 

This sounds like a nice idea, yes. But. There is no reason that nature should actually be described by a theory of everything. While we do need a theory of quantum gravity to avoid logical inconsistency in the laws of nature, the forces in the standard model do not have to be unified, and they do not have to be unified with gravity. It would be pretty, yes, but it’s unnecessary. The standard model works just fine without unification. 

So this whole idea of a theory of everything is based on an unscientific premise. Some people would like the laws of nature to be pretty in a very specific way. They want it to be simple, they want it to be symmetric, they want it to be natural, and here I have to warn you that “natural” is a technical term. So they have an idea of what they want to be true. Then they stumble over some piece of mathematics that strikes them as particularly pretty and they become convinced that certainly it must play a role for the laws of nature. In brief, they invent a theory for what they think the universe should be like.

Nature clearly doesn’t give a damn what physicists think is pretty math.

This is simply not a good strategy to develop scientific theories, and no, it is most certainly not standard methodology. Indeed, the opposite is the case. Relying on beauty in theory development has historically worked badly. In physics, breakthroughs in theory-development have come instead from the resolution of mathematical inconsistencies. I have literally written a book about how problematic it is that researchers in the foundations of physics insist on using methods of theory development that we have no reason to think should work, and that as a matter of fact do not work. 

The search for a theory of everything and for grand unification began in the 1980s. To the extent that the theories which physicists have come up with were falsifiable they have been falsified. Nature clearly doesn’t give a damn what physicists think is pretty math. 

Having said that, what do you think I think about Lisi’s and Weinstein’s and Wolfram’s attempts at a theory of everything? Well, scientific history teaches us that their method of guessing some pretty piece of math and hoping it’s useful for something is extremely unpromising. It is not impossible it works, but it is almost certainly a waste of time. And I have looked closely enough at Lisi’s and Weinstein’s and Wolfram’s and many other people’s theories of everything to be able to tell you that they have not convincingly solved any actual problem in the existing fundamental theories. And I’m not interested to look any closer, because I don’t also want to waste my time.

But I don’t like commenting on individual people’s theories of everything. I don’t like it because it strikes me as deeply unfair. These are mostly researchers working alone or in small groups. They are very dedicated to their pursuit and they work incredibly hard on it. They’re mostly not paid by tax money so it’s really their private thing and who am I to judge them? Also, many of you evidently find it entertaining to have geniuses with their theories of everything around. That’s all fine with me.

I get a problem if theories that despite having turned out to be useless grow to large, tax-paid research programs that employ thousands of people, as it has happened with string theory and supersymmetry and grand unification. That creates a problem because it eats up resources and can entirely stall progress, which is what has happened in the foundations of physics. 

People like Lisi and Weinstein and Wolfram at least remind us that the big programs are not the only thing you can do with math. So, odd as it sounds, while I don’t think their specific research avenue is any more promising than string theory, I’m glad they do it anyway. Indeed, physics can need more people like them who have the courage to go their own way, no matter how difficult. 

The brief summary is that if you hear something about a newly proposed theory of everything, do not ask whether the math is right. Because many of the people who work on this are really smart and they know their math and it’s probably right. The question you, and all science journalists who report on such things, should ask is what reason do we have to think that this particular piece of math has anything to do with reality. “Because it’s pretty” is not a scientific answer. And I have never seen a theory of everything that gave a satisfactory scientific answer to this question.

Sabine Hossenfelder is a Research Fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies where she works on physics beyond the standard model, phenomenological quantum gravity, and modifications of general relativity. If you want to know more about what is going wrong with the foundations of physics, read her book Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray.

Get the Nautilus newsletter

The newest and most popular articles delivered right to your inbox!

This post was originally published on Backreaction, Hossenfelder’s blog, and his reprinted with permission.

FREE Digital Newspaper Subscription!
Sign up for your free digital subscription. The FREE Cape Cod News

Unsubscribe
FREE Cape Cod News

FREE Cape Cod News

Free Cape Cod News is what's happening in the Cape Cod, U.S and World & what people are talking about right now. Local newspaper. Stay in the know. Subscribe to get notified about our latest news.

Related Posts

Astronomers sound alarm about light pollution from satellites thumbnail
Nature

Astronomers sound alarm about light pollution from satellites

by FREE Cape Cod News
March 22, 2023
America used to have its own lion. Where did they go? thumbnail
Nature

America used to have its own lion. Where did they go?

by FREE Cape Cod News
March 20, 2023
People may have been riding horses as early as 5,000 years ago thumbnail
Nature

People may have been riding horses as early as 5,000 years ago

by FREE Cape Cod News
March 5, 2023
A smartly trained voice monitor could save singers, teachers, and loud talkers from strain thumbnail
Nature

A smartly trained voice monitor could save singers, teachers, and loud talkers from strain

by FREE Cape Cod News
February 23, 2023
Load More
Please login to join discussion

Follow Us on Twitter

FREE Cape Cod News - Your source for local Cape Cod news, latest breaking U.S. and World news. Every day, all day. Subscribe for your favorite categories.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Jake Paul among 8 celebrities charged by SEC for ‘illegally touting’ crypto scheme thumbnail

Jake Paul among 8 celebrities charged by SEC for ‘illegally touting’ crypto scheme

March 23, 2023
Experts: Republicans’ “punitive” attacks on SNAP could strip food aid from over 10 million people thumbnail

Experts: Republicans’ “punitive” attacks on SNAP could strip food aid from over 10 million people

March 23, 2023
Boston's new star puts on a Classic show thumbnail

Boston’s new star puts on a Classic show

March 23, 2023
Jake Paul among 8 celebrities charged by SEC for ‘illegally touting’ crypto scheme thumbnail

Jake Paul among 8 celebrities charged by SEC for ‘illegally touting’ crypto scheme

March 23, 2023
Boston's new star puts on a Classic show thumbnail

Boston’s new star puts on a Classic show

March 23, 2023
Experts: Republicans’ “punitive” attacks on SNAP could strip food aid from over 10 million people thumbnail

Experts: Republicans’ “punitive” attacks on SNAP could strip food aid from over 10 million people

March 23, 2023

FREE Cape Cod News On Twitter

Today’s News

  • Jake Paul among 8 celebrities charged by SEC for ‘illegally touting’ crypto scheme March 23, 2023
  • Boston’s new star puts on a Classic show March 23, 2023
  • Experts: Republicans’ “punitive” attacks on SNAP could strip food aid from over 10 million people March 23, 2023
  • Hospitals re-evaluate masking, PPE as state mandates end March 23, 2023
  • With possible indictment looming, Trump dominates House Republican retreat March 22, 2023
FREE Cape Cod News

Copyright © 2022 Free Cape Cod News

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
  • Donate

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • FREE Cape Cod News
  • News
    • News
    • Cape Cod News
    • Massachusetts
    • Breaking News
    • Cape Cod Weather
    • Storm Watch
    • Environment
  • Politics
    • democrats
    • republicans
  • Business
    • business
    • cryptocurrency
    • economy
    • money
    • Real Estate
    • Tech
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Photos
    • Orleans
    • Eastham
    • Wellfleet
    • Truro
    • Provincetown
    • Brewster
    • Chatham
  • Videos
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Copyright © 2022 Free Cape Cod News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist